From owner-freebsd-mobile Sun Aug 6 19:28:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [209.192.237.190]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7398E37BC2F for ; Sun, 6 Aug 2000 19:28:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pir@pir.net) Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim) id 13LceR-0000GM-00 for freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 06 Aug 2000 22:28:27 -0400 Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2000 22:28:26 -0400 From: Peter Radcliffe To: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.0RELEASE and 3COM589EC Message-ID: <20000806222826.B22130@pir.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200008070123.SAA04980@bubba.whistle.com> <200008070151.TAA28079@harmony.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <200008070151.TAA28079@harmony.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Sun, Aug 06, 2000 at 07:51:10PM -0600 X-fish: < Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Warner Losh probably said: > Generally speaking, you can't. There are too many whacked out > configurations in the wild to be able to do it always. However, it > wouldn't be too hard to do this. It is waiting for an ioctl to be > written for the card device that asks "Can I use this?" so pccardd can > be hacked to cope. I have to say I did prefer the PAO approach of "what irqs can I definately not use that I think I can" and let it sort out the rest. Caused me fewer problems. > The NEWCARD stuff should be better about this, btw. Thats good to hear. P. -- pir pir@pir.net pir@net.tufts.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message