From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 20:36:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C5D8A33; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 20:36:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.server1.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [82.193.243.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68786E7D; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 20:36:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad (HSI-KBW-134-3-231-194.hsi14.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de [134.3.231.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.server1.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F9F6861EA; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 21:36:52 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <511561E3.4090404@bsdforen.de> Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 21:36:51 +0100 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130129 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: Bumping libreoffice References: <511548F2.4030303@bsdforen.de> <20130208201926.GB55651@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20130208201926.GB55651@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: office@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 20:36:54 -0000 On 08/02/2013 21:19, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 07:50:26PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote: >> Please take note of Porters' Handbook section 5.2.2.1. >> >> Build fixes are NOT a reason to bump portrevision! >> > > Working on ports like LibreOffice is painful enough to have such aggressive > reaction. ... If I received an e-mail like this I wouldn't think it's aggressive or be offended. I'm aware people take offence at a lot of things that don't look offensive to me, but I don't have a good way to judge this (on behalf of not being able to see the offence). So thank you for telling me. -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?