From owner-freebsd-current Fri Jan 30 17:22:01 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA12180 for current-outgoing; Fri, 30 Jan 1998 17:22:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA12107 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 1998 17:21:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.8.8/8.8.5) id UAA23804; Fri, 30 Jan 1998 20:08:32 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 20:08:32 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <199801310108.UAA23804@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Terry Lambert Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: LFS is nuked? In-Reply-To: <199801310004.RAA13451@usr05.primenet.com> References: <19980130234945.43035@klemm.gtn.com> <199801310004.RAA13451@usr05.primenet.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG X-To-Unsubscribe: mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org "unsubscribe current" < said: > Of course, we all know that once something is in the attic, it's > bound to be studiosly attended to, just like the XNS, ISO, and > X.25 code have all been fixed... But unlike XNS, ISO-CLNS, and X.25, LFS might actually be of value to real users. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick