From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 13 14:05:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3E11065679; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:05:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zim.MIT.EDU (ZIM.MIT.EDU [18.95.3.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A9F8FC1B; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:05:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zim.MIT.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zim.MIT.EDU (8.14.5/8.14.2) with ESMTP id pBDE5pLA093260; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:05:51 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from das@localhost) by zim.MIT.EDU (8.14.5/8.14.2/Submit) id pBDE5pqS093259; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:05:51 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:05:51 -0500 From: David Schultz To: Ed Schouten Message-ID: <20111213140551.GA93161@zim.MIT.EDU> Mail-Followup-To: Ed Schouten , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org References: <201112131338.pBDDc3lt052068@svn.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201112131338.pBDDc3lt052068@svn.freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: svn commit: r228469 - in head/sys: amd64/include arm/include i386/include ia64/include mips/include ofed/include/asm powerpc/include sparc64/include X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:05:56 -0000 On Tue, Dec 13, 2011, Ed Schouten wrote: > Author: ed > Date: Tue Dec 13 13:38:03 2011 > New Revision: 228469 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/228469 > > Log: > Replace __signed by signed. > > The signed keyword is an integral part of the C syntax. There's no need > to use __signed. For what it's worth, I believe __signed and __const were intended to support gcc's -traditional flag, which was needed to get some pre-ANSI programs to compile. But any vestiges of pre-ANSI support probably rotted a long time ago, and the -traditional option isn't supported anymore in gcc.