Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 14:26:21 -0500 (EST) From: c0ldbyte <c0ldbyte@myrealbox.com> To: gerarra@tin.it Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5-STABLE kernel build with icc broken Message-ID: <20050327142324.D15693@eleanor.us1.wmi.uvac.net> In-Reply-To: <420008450006DC4F@ims3a.cp.tin.it> References: <420008450006DC4F@ims3a.cp.tin.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 gerarra@tin.it wrote: >> >> Without intending to start any compiler holy wars, what benefits does >> ICC provide over GCC for the end user? >> > > ICC would provide better low level code (remind: Intel C Compiler. It would > mean better performance). > > rookie > If any, still produces not all that much of a difference of code between the newer gcc34 and as much performance differance as your going to get isnt going to even be noticeable in the long run. Your just setting your self up for failure with something that isnt really going to give you the desired effects. - -- Best regards, --c0ldbyte -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) Comment: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF7DF979F iD8DBQFCRwjgsmFQuvffl58RAoqKAJ44D4TFVVaHgK2bP7rrKV0cLHBGlQCeJauB ajI0mxvPps7e/l9dU14DMMU= =73/q -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050327142324.D15693>