From owner-cvs-ports  Tue Feb 13 02:39:55 1996
Return-Path: owner-cvs-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id CAA29484
          for cvs-ports-outgoing; Tue, 13 Feb 1996 02:39:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA29469
          Tue, 13 Feb 1996 02:39:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.7.3/8.6.9) id CAA02430; Tue, 13 Feb 1996 02:35:11 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 02:35:11 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199602131035.CAA02430@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de
CC: wosch@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org,
        cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199602121722.SAA00550@uriah.heep.sax.de> (message from J Wunsch on Mon, 12 Feb 1996 18:22:42 +0100 (MET))
Subject: Re: cvs commit:  ports/sysutils/top/files m_freebsd21.c m_freebsd21.man defaults ports/sysutils/top Makefile
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

 * >   freebsd20 -> freebsd21 module
 * 
 * Should have been freebsd22.  Sigh.  I've raised my objection before.

Yeah I thought "why is it 21"?  What's the issue here?  Why is Wolfram
committing a file for 2.1 in the 2.2-current ports tree (although it
appears to work for 2.2-current as well)?

Satoshi