From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Apr 4 15:57:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net (hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A088637B41C for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 15:57:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from pool0517.cvx21-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.194.7] helo=mindspring.com) by hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16tH6g-0004Bs-00; Thu, 04 Apr 2002 15:57:30 -0800 Message-ID: <3CACE84F.D54C9248@mindspring.com> Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 15:57:03 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony} (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen J Bevan Cc: John Regehr , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linuxthreads on Linux vs FreeBSD performance question References: <3CAC036C.71DB41BB@mindspring.com> <15532.35908.341722.136026@apathy.etunnels.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Stephen J Bevan wrote: > > The correct approach for CPU affinity is to run with per > > CPU scheduler queues. ... > > If "scheduler queue" means the same as "run queue" then > per CPU run queues were added to Linux in 2.5.2. See > http://lwn.net/2002/0110/a/scheduler.php3. I know this. The version we are discussing is 2.4.17, which is the version John Regehr is using for his paper. FreeBSD -current doesn't have a number of the deficiencies I note for FreeBSD, either, but he was using FreeBSD 4.5. The comparison was based on the version numbers he noted. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message