From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 21 15:39: 9 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2135237BD0A for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 15:39:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA24827; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 16:39:02 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id QAA26656; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 16:38:48 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200003212338.QAA26656@harmony.village.org> To: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: Voxware is toast. Get used to it. (Re: Suggestions for improving newpcm performance?) Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , David Murphy , stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 21 Mar 2000 19:35:38 +0100." References: <13451.953657593@zippy.cdrom.com> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 16:38:48 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Brad Knowles writes: : However, that's precisely the kind of additional work that needs : to get folded into 4.0, so that 4.1 or 4.2 *is* ready for general use : in a production environment. What, specifically, is broken in 4.0 that would preclude its use in production systems? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message