From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 13 04:24:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002E016A41F for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 04:24:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8504B43D45 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 04:24:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from default.chvlva.adelphia.net ([69.160.76.67]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with ESMTP id <20050913042444.QGWI12165.mta10.adelphia.net@default.chvlva.adelphia.net>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:24:44 -0400 Received: by default.chvlva.adelphia.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2A619B541; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:24:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:24:44 -0400 From: Parv To: Bob Perry Message-ID: <20050913042444.GA2856@holestein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Bob Perry , f-q References: <1126485205.806.27.camel@homey.my.domain> <20050912075459.GB85219@holestein.holy.cow> <1126584170.758.8.camel@homey.my.domain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1126584170.758.8.camel@homey.my.domain> Cc: f-q Subject: Re: Unable to Replace Currently Running IPF Rules With IPF Command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: f-q List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 04:24:46 -0000 in message <1126584170.758.8.camel@homey.my.domain>, wrote Bob Perry thusly... > > On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 03:54 -0400, Parv wrote: > > in message <1126485205.806.27.camel@homey.my.domain>, wrote Bob > > Perry thusly... > > > > > > I notice that when I attempt to replace the currently running > > > ruleset, my system (FreeBSD 5.4 RELEASE) is unable to > > > recognize the file name. For instance, the command, "ipf -Fa > > > -f /etc/ipf.rules" results in "26: unknown words at end: [/], > > > ipf: /etc/ipf.rules: parse error (1), quitting." ... > > The error seems to be w/ the (rule on) line 26 of > > /etc/ipf.rules. ... > I placed the / at the end of a line thinking it was needed to > continue the rule on the next line. Guess you don't need it using > ascii text. As i put a rule completely on one line, i cannot comment whethere splitting is possible or if there will not be any errors after splittling. - Parv --