From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Apr 13 16:46:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n0b.san.rr.com (dt051n0b.san.rr.com [204.210.32.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12C737BE84; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:46:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from slave (doug@slave [10.0.0.1]) by dt051n0b.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA12197; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:46:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:46:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton X-Sender: doug@dt051n0b.san.rr.com To: Warner Losh Cc: Kris Kennaway , "Jordan K. Hubbard" , Robin Melville , stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 4.0, OpenSSL and MD5 (fwd) In-Reply-To: <200004132336.RAA49054@harmony.village.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Warner Losh wrote: > In message Kris Kennaway writes: > : .if exists(${.CURDIR}/../../secure) && !defined(NOCRYPT) && > : !defined(NOSECURE) && !defined(NO_OPENSSL) && !defined(RELEASE_CRUNCH) > > .if exists(${.CURDIR}/../../secure) && ${NO_CRYPT} != "no" && \ > ${NO_SECURE} != "no" && ${NO_OPENSSL} != "no" && ${RELEASE_CRUNCH} == "yes" > > seems to be about the same to me and easier to read. Just keep in mind that we would need to (read, "should") throw in . . . && ${NO_CRYPT} != "no" && ${NO_CRYPT} != "NO" for each option. Of course, I'm still in favor of having the values be tested (I think that violoates POLA less than the status quo). Doug -- Excess on occasion is exhilarating. It prevents moderation from acquiring the deadening effect of a habit. -- W. Somerset Maugham To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message