From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 23 20:55:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B6F816A41C for ; Mon, 23 May 2005 20:55:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4338743D48 for ; Mon, 23 May 2005 20:55:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.81]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP id <20050523205500.GHAR13270.mta11.adelphia.net@barbish>; Mon, 23 May 2005 16:55:00 -0400 From: "fbsd_user" To: "Eugene Hercun" , , Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 16:54:56 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: downloading entire directories X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 20:55:01 -0000 check the ports for FTP. there are ftp ports that do what you want ftp to do. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Eugene Hercun Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 4:36 PM To: derdrache@gmail.com; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: downloading entire directories I think I will just stick with wget, I like the way it works. Does anyone know why there is no recursive feature implemented into something as basic as ftp? DerDrache what do you mean by sounding redundantly redundant? I guess the Perl motto works in almost all situations, TIMTOWTDI. But I guess I'm looking for the 'better' way to do it. Thank you all once again. Eugene _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"