From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 1 07:30:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA54106564A; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 07:30:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5AA68FC0C; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 07:30:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwr19 with SMTP id 19so3539072iwr.13 for ; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 00:30:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=3IPxsjW1B2nABZnKbUZBdZfwurLwUVRmIbIu9Pdfo2A=; b=dZnDp9x9s5pTafdHyAUq0iux1YMBuVrTCyEHWpzCeSpvRNdE+2mzPN31qMDOQKnGCT Vk5hPv3LnzqtJtu1lY/weqMOPwHWv5DzzZlPpAG7rLzGpvYHw+xefYJiG8BKeVkUefN0 GkQoiLiXPrd9R/xLPiKouCFc3kaBmu8ujRNeA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.116.92 with SMTP id l28mr2651796ibq.20.1309505425933; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 00:30:25 -0700 (PDT) Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.49.193 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 00:30:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.49.193 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 00:30:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E0C5B7A.5060102@FreeBSD.org> References: <4E0C5B7A.5060102@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 08:30:25 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Qr1yT5dDY423SV7FMm7b9suLorA Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Julien Laffaye Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Jeremy Messenger , ohauer@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, Chris Rees Subject: Re: Call for testers -- CONF_FILES variable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 07:30:27 -0000 On 30 Jun 2011 12:18, "Julien Laffaye" wrote: > > On 06/30/2011 08:22, Chris Rees wrote: > >> > >> I like the rest, but I do not like the name of .pkgconf. I think, the > >> 'pkgconf' is best define for something related with FreeBSD rather > >> than third-party product. The .sample or .default is best name and > >> less confuse for the users, because the word said it all what it is. > > > > Thanks for the feedback. > > > > I'm afraid any problems with the .pkgconf sample will have to be > > discussed with the pkgng team and bapt@ -- wasn't my choice either. > > > > Chris > > Yes, right now, pkgng uses the .pkgconf suffix to know that it is a > configuration file. But now, we have a new format for the package > manifest so _maybe_ (it has to be discussed with bapt) we can add an > attribute to a file entry saying "I am a sample of a conf file". The > hardest part for that would be to detect in the ports tree if we are > using pkgng or the legacy pkg_install, and, depending on that, to > generate the appropriate entry in the manifest / plist. So perhaps that suffix should stay. I certainly don't relish the prospect otherwise of having to cull every unexec cmp in the entire ports tree.... Chris