From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Mar 16 09:21:52 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id JAA13568 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 16 Mar 1995 09:21:52 -0800 Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA13562 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 1995 09:21:52 -0800 Received: (from phk@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id JAA11807; Thu, 16 Mar 1995 09:21:26 -0800 From: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-Id: <199503161721.JAA11807@ref.tfs.com> Subject: Re: diskless and 3Com 509 To: peter@bonkers.taronga.com (Peter da Silva) Date: Thu, 16 Mar 1995 09:21:26 -0800 (PST) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199503161339.HAA26203@bonkers.taronga.com> from "Peter da Silva" at Mar 16, 95 07:39:30 am Content-Type: text Content-Length: 534 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I've seen a lot of criticism of BSD-derived telnets because you can't use > them for Q&D smtp or nntp information snarfing because they exit on EOF. > Apparently USG-derived ones wait for the other end to shut down if stdin > is a plain file. I'd like some inputs on the pros and cons of copying the > USG behaviour in this case. well, go fix it :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc. 'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent' => 'no rude people are relevant'