From owner-freebsd-fortran@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jul 10 13:38:25 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fortran@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fortran@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C073F9
 for <freebsd-fortran@freebsd.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 13:38:25 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from thierry@pompo.net)
Received: from mx1a.lautre.net (eyra.lautre.net [80.67.160.71])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D67A61DD7
 for <freebsd-fortran@freebsd.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 13:38:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from graf.pompo.net (graf.pompo.net [78.225.128.39])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 (Authenticated sender: thierry@pompo.net)
 by mx1a.lautre.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44D5240A5B
 for <freebsd-fortran@freebsd.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 15:38:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by graf.pompo.net (Postfix, from userid 1001)
 id A833142D28ED; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 15:38:17 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 15:38:17 +0200
From: Thierry Thomas <thierry@FreeBSD.org>
To: freebsd-fortran@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: why fortran mailing list?
Message-ID: <20130710133817.GB41178@graf.pompo.net>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-fortran@freebsd.org
References: <20130710084713.GA73590@graf.pompo.net>
 <201307100908.r6A98jOM001342@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <201307100908.r6A98jOM001342@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE i386
Organization: Kabbale Eros
X-Face: (hRbQnK~Pt7$ct`!fupO(`y_WL4^-Iwn4@ly-.,[4xC4xc;
 y=\ipKMNm<1J>lv@PP~7Z<.t KjAnXLs:
X-PGP: 0xC71405A2
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fortran@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Fortran on FreeBSD <freebsd-fortran.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-fortran>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-fortran-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fortran>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fortran@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fortran-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fortran>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-fortran-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 13:38:25 -0000

Le mer 10 jul 13 à 11:08:45 +0200, Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bris.ac.uk>
 écrivait :

> Regarding this patch, is it ok to just put it
> unde files, as:
> 
> # ls files/
> medis-patch-Lib_Makefile.txt    patch-Lib::proto.h              patch-Test::Makefile
> patch-CONFIG::configure         patch-Lib_Makefile              patch-onmetis
> patch-CONFIG_onmetis.in         patch-Programs::Makefile
> #
> 
> How does the ports framework know that
> medis-patch-Lib_Makefile.txt must be applied
> *after* patch-Lib_Makefile, i.e. on top of it?

Actually, it has to be renamed as patch-*. And patches are applied
sorted by their name.

> P.S. Please ignore my reply to ports/176328.
> I understand now what to do.

Great!
-- 
Th. Thomas.