From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 29 08:40:27 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 28B9537B401; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 08:40:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CCDFE43F85; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 08:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from des@ofug.org)
Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602)
	id E01C85308; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 17:40:22 +0200 (CEST)
X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/
X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily
  coincide with those of any organisation or company with
  which I am or have been affiliated.
To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 17:40:22 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20030428111859.GA2923@madman.celabo.org> ("Jacques A.
 Vidrine"'s message of "Mon, 28 Apr 2003 06:18:59 -0500")
Message-ID: <xzp8ytts461.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.2
References: <20030428075916.GA53857@myhakas.internal>
	<20030428190209.A21656@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
	<20030428075916.GA53857@myhakas.internal>
	<20030428080505.GA1474@chihiro.leafy.idv.tw>
	<20030428075916.GA53857@myhakas.internal>
	<20030428105521.GB2676@madman.celabo.org>
	<20030428111859.GA2923@madman.celabo.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
cc: Vallo Kallaste <vallo@estcard.ee>
cc: Tim Robbins <tjr@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: Somethings still up with new NSS?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 15:40:27 -0000

"Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> But, if you run `pwd_mkdb -u' BEFORE you rebuild the entire database
> with plain `pwd_mkdb', the database will have version 3 entries for
> all of your users, but only a version 4 entry for the single target
> user.  Old binaries still function fine, but new binaries now `see'
> that the database supports the new version 4 entries.  So, only the
> single user that was updated is recognized.

Why do new binaries ignore the older version 3 entries?

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org