From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Sep 27 18:50:22 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA26793 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 27 Sep 1996 18:50:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA26761 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 1996 18:50:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.utexas.edu ([128.83.126.2]) by who.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.11) with SMTP id SAA13398 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 1996 18:50:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail-queue invoked by uid 0); 28 Sep 1996 01:49:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.utexas.edu) (128.83.126.1) by smtp.utexas.edu with SMTP; 28 Sep 1996 01:49:17 -0000 Received: from [208.2.87.4] (cod.dataplex.net [208.2.87.4]) by mail.utexas.edu (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id UAA23300; Fri, 27 Sep 1996 20:49:11 -0500 X-Sender: rkw@eel.dataplex.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 20:49:14 -0500 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" From: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) Subject: Re: libz.so.1.0 where are you? Cc: John Polstra , hackers@FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >> Is there some reason that the library was not brought into the -stable tree? > >None that I see, just a matter of testing and time. IMHO, even untested, inclusion is better than NOT AVAILABLE.