From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Aug  5 13:55:43 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA04544
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 13:55:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell.uniserve.com (tom@shell.uniserve.com [204.244.210.252])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA04539
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 13:55:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (tom@localhost)
	by shell.uniserve.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA11708;
	Tue, 5 Aug 1997 13:52:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: shell.uniserve.com: tom owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 1997 13:52:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tom <tom@uniserve.com>
To: Daniel Sobral <Daniel_Sobral@voga.com.br>
cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Fetchmail
In-Reply-To: <032564EA.006C9FB5.00@papagaio.voga.com.br>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970805135205.11706A-100000@shell.uniserve.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 5 Aug 1997, Daniel Sobral wrote:

> I was wondering... Wouldn't fetchmail make a valuable addition to the bin
> distribution? Not to mention that
> the recent 4.0 version (yeah, I know, Erik's at 4.0.8 or so at the present)
> was created just so it could be included
> in distributions (though he was thinking more of Linux).

  I've looked at fetchmail, but never used it.  It would just be a waste
of space for me.

Tom