From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Jul 28 01:16:41 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id BAA05803 for questions-outgoing; Sun, 28 Jul 1996 01:16:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ghost.mep.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (ghost.mep.ruhr-uni-bochum.de [134.147.6.16]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id BAA05779 for ; Sun, 28 Jul 1996 01:16:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from re@localhost) by ghost.mep.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (8.6.12/8.6.9) id KAA08014 for questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 28 Jul 1996 10:16:29 +0200 From: Robert Eckardt Message-Id: <199607280816.KAA08014@ghost.mep.ruhr-uni-bochum.de> Subject: Update on 'partition sector garbled ...' To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 28 Jul 1996 10:16:28 +0200 (MET DST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hello, about one year ago I reported a bug in FBSD-2.0.5. My ISC-Unix partition was removed from the partition sector while installing FreeBSD. This error persisted in 2.1 and is also alive in 2.1.5. This time however, I went into depth and found that the wd driver reports the wrong number of cylinders. My AT-Bus disk (Conner 544CP) has 1054 cylinders, but FreeBSD sees only 1053. It is partitioned as: System Boot Sid Cyl Sec Sid Cyl Sec Offset Size DOS-16 (4) No 1 0 1 15 64 63 63 65457 FreeBSD (165) No 0 65 1 15 227 63 65520 164304 ISC-2.2 (99) Yes 0 390 1 15 1023 63 393120 669312 Solaris (130) No 0 228 1 15 389 63 229824 163296 The ISC partition ends on cylinder 1053 (and it exists indeed). However, since fdisk sees only 1053 (0-1052) cylinders the ISC-partition is not completely inside the disk and therefore marked as 'unused'. (Writing the slices leaves me with some handwork to restore the partition table. :-( ) Note that ISC saw 1054 cyls. -- as in the BIOS -- that's why I used them. Any idea why FreeBSD sees only 1053 cyls. or how to work around ? Anything special about the Conner ? Regards, Robert