Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 08:02:14 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@dk.tfs.com> To: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Cc: phk@dk.tfs.com (Poul-Henning Kamp), peter@spinner.dialix.com.au, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-etc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/mtree BSD.local.dist BSD.usr.dist Message-ID: <8942.870069734@critter.dk.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 28 Jul 1997 10:58:51 %2B0930." <199707280128.KAA02595@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> Well, it is "libraries" and the default would have put them in /usr/lib, >> which I though was too disgusting, but if there is concensus for another >> location, we'll change it. I'm not religious. > >/usr/libdata is better, IMHO. ok. >> >Hmm.. That's not all of the problems, it's got hard coded references to >> >/usr/local as well. There are not supposed to be any active references to >> >/usr/local in the src tree. >> >> We have other similar /usr/local references in the tree. /etc/rc for >> instance will go look in /usr/local/etc/rc.d for shell scripts. > >Hmm. And I'd be asking for /usr/local/libdata/tcl/* as well. This is >less than wonderful though, for obvious reasons. It searches the "system" location first... >How hard would it be to have some configuration entity somewhere that >pointed to the local "local" stuff, ie. have it runtime-configurable? No idea :-( -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Power and ignorance is a disgusting cocktail.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8942.870069734>