From owner-freebsd-mobile  Wed Mar  5 17:17:19 1997
Return-Path: <owner-mobile>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA28344
          for mobile-outgoing; Wed, 5 Mar 1997 17:17:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out2.ibm.net (out2.ibm.net [165.87.201.252])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA28339
          for <freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 1997 17:17:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by out2.ibm.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) id BAA31131; Thu, 6 Mar 1997 01:15:50 GMT
Message-Id: <199703060115.BAA31131@out2.ibm.net>
Received: from slip166-72-229-143.va.us.ibm.net(166.72.229.143) by out2.ibm.net via smap (V1.3mjr)
	id smaC3MCKs; Thu Mar  6 01:15:38 1997
From: "Steve Sims" <SimsS@IBM.Net>
To: "Nate Williams" <nate@mt.sri.com>
Cc: <freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: sio probes broken in PAO-970210?
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 20:15:10 -0500
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-mobile@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
> > Sorry, Nate - I don't follow you....  Do you mean "A clean 2.2-GAMMA
> > install doesn't have the patches from PAO"?  If so, this I understand.
> 
> Yes, that's what I meant. :)
> 
> > If you mean "the 970210 PAO tarball doesn't have sio changes folded in"
> > then I don't understand at all.  less'ing sys.patch, I can see mods to
> > sio.c and they got applied to my kernel source code when I installed
the
> > PAO-970210 patch(es).
> 
> No, you need to apply the PAO patches to 2.2 to get working SIO support
> for your laptop.
> 
> > > You can get the PAO patches to 2.2 and see if they help.
Been there, done that.  I started with ssys.?? for 2.2-GAMMA, then applied
PAO-970210 off the PAO home page.  (They purport to be in alpha-test
against 2.2-GAMMA) then config'ed my kernel, make'ed it, install'ed it and
rebooted.  No joy.

> > Where?  Something I've missed?
> 
> The PAO patches are against 2.2Gamma, aren't they?
I assume so; the sys.patch applies cleanly against a pristing 2.2-GAMMA
source deck.

Still hunting for a clue....

...sjs...