Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 21:03:21 +0100 (MET) From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> To: fenner@FreeBSD.ORG (Bill Fenner) Cc: anttik@silic.one.sci.fi, fenner@hub.freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/4972 Message-ID: <199711162003.VAA15466@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <199711162038.MAA13355@hub.freebsd.org> from "Bill Fenner" at Nov 16, 97 12:37:55 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Synopsis: submission of textual cdplayer port > > State-Changed-From-To: open-feedback > State-Changed-By: fenner > State-Changed-When: Sun Nov 16 12:37:16 PST 1997 > State-Changed-Why: > Given the existence of "cdcontrol" in the base system, do you > think this port is needed? cdcontrol could be improved from many points of view. I haven't seen cdplayer, but if it works better than cdcontrol why not have a replacement ? After all we have plenty of duplicates for other modules (2-3 version of X cd player, mixers, all variations of vi, etc.) Cheers Luigi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199711162003.VAA15466>