From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jul 1 15:20:43 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from smtp1.vnet.net (smtp1.vnet.net [166.82.1.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 485C714D1F for ; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 15:20:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rivers@dignus.com) Received: from dignus.com (ponds.vnet.net [166.82.177.48]) by smtp1.vnet.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA10245; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 18:20:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes.dignus.com [10.0.0.3]) by dignus.com (8.9.2/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA27894; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 18:20:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.9.2/8.6.9) id SAA45006; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 18:20:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 18:20:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <199907012220.SAA45006@lakes.dignus.com> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, mjacob@feral.com Subject: Re: Lizard... In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > > That being said... I've heard some of my ex-coworkers (who were all > > FreeBSD people when they worked here) come up to me in this impressed > > tone: "You wouldn't believe how much easier it is to install RedHat!'. > > *sigh* I'm not bitching... just being loyal :) > > That's ridiculous. I've used both, and RedHat is not that much better, if > at all. > I'd have to concur. I've done both - actually - the RedHat really isn't that different from FreeBSD (that was RedHat 5.2.) - a few of nice boxes you fill in - pop the CD in the drive... *poof* - Dave Rivers - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message