Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 09:38:13 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Carlos_Mendes_Lu=EDs?= <jonny@jonny.eng.br> To: Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de> Cc: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: ISO names (Was: 4.9-RC2 is on ftp-master..) Message-ID: <3F840535.1060207@jonny.eng.br> In-Reply-To: <200310081041.h98Af46G068054@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <200310081041.h98Af46G068054@lurza.secnetix.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Since we already are on this subject:
I've been studying the availability of FreeBSD ISOs on edonkey networks,
and, surprise, I just noted that the ISO has no "FreeBSD" on its name.
What do you think of changing the names to:
FreeBSD-4.9-RC2-i386-disc1.iso
FreeBSD-4.9-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso
FreeBSD-5.2-RELEASE-alpha-disc1.iso
FreeBSD-5.2-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso
and so on?
Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Murray Stokely wrote:
> > Subject: 4.9-RC2 is on ftp-master..
>
> Just a small question: Wouldn't it be a good idea to put
> each RC under its own subdirectory in ISO-IMAGES, too?
> It would be cleaner, and it would make mirroring easier,
> especially for those who keep older releases and can't
> just sync the whole ISO-IMAGES directory without fiddeling
> with exclude patterns or things like that.
>
> For my own mirror, I've taken the liberty to move the RCs
> into their own subdirectories (because I _do_ keep older
> releases and don't want to make my life more painful than
> necessary). ;-)
>
> Regards
> Oliver
>
> PS: In case someone keeps track of it, ftp7.de.freebsd.org
> is up to date WRT 4.9-RC2.
>
--
Jonny
--
João Carlos Mendes Luís - Networking Engineer - jonny@jonny.eng.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F840535.1060207>