From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec 13 11:14:59 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97DB816A547
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:14:59 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com)
Received: from mail.ticketswitch.com (mail.ticketswitch.com [194.200.93.188])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9962F43D5C
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:12:44 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com)
Received: from [172.16.1.6] (helo=dilbert.ticketswitch.com)
	by mail.ticketswitch.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <petefrench@ticketswitch.com>)
	id 1GuS3w-000Axf-99; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:14:12 +0000
Received: from petefrench by dilbert.ticketswitch.com with local (Exim 4.63
	(FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <petefrench@ticketswitch.com>)
	id 1GuS3w-000DJS-26; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:14:12 +0000
To: max@love2party.net
In-Reply-To: <200612131209.12687.max@love2party.net>
Message-Id: <E1GuS3w-000DJS-26@dilbert.ticketswitch.com>
From: Pete French <petefrench@ticketswitch.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:14:12 +0000
Cc: spork@bway.net, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: pf killing NFS
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:14:59 -0000

> You are misunderstanding.  The problem is simply that the bpf device sees=20
> bad checksums as it sees the packet before the hardware has calculated=20
> it.  On the receiver the checksum will be correct.

Ah, gotcha. That makes perfect sense now.

-pete.