From owner-freebsd-scsi Sun Sep 1 08:21:16 1996 Return-Path: owner-freebsd-scsi Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA00176 for freebsd-scsi-outgoing; Sun, 1 Sep 1996 08:21:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.1.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA00160 for ; Sun, 1 Sep 1996 08:21:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sax.sax.de (sax.sax.de [193.175.26.33]) by irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with ESMTP id RAA02827; Sun, 1 Sep 1996 17:21:05 +0200 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by sax.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id RAA01271; Sun, 1 Sep 1996 17:21:05 +0200 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.7.5/8.6.9) id RAA18148; Sun, 1 Sep 1996 17:06:21 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch Message-Id: <199609011506.RAA18148@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: Re: Putting the "experimental" SCSI system on a branch To: peter@spinner.DIALix.COM (Peter Wemm) Date: Sun, 1 Sep 1996 17:06:21 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org, freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) In-Reply-To: <199609010710.PAA03615@spinner.DIALix.COM> from Peter Wemm at "Sep 1, 96 03:10:36 pm" X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL17 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As Peter Wemm wrote: > > I think all you need to do is to run easy-import on them, specify an > > existing module name (sys_scsi), and perform a vendor-branch import. > > No, this is something completely different..... This will put it on the > VENDOR branch for merging into HEAD. It will be generally inaccessable to > the users. Any new files will appear on the HEAD revision. Well, i thought this is what Justin intented? The changes should finally go into HEAD, it's just that this needs to be deferred until everything is in a working state again. Now that it's already done, the new files appearing in HEAD don't matter much. It's simply that they aren't referred to by the Makefile yet. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)