From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 19 20:47:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CCF106566C; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 20:47:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from spartan.hamla.org (spartan.hamla.org [206.251.255.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898F88FC14; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 20:47:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spartan.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2791711F; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:47:42 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tandon.net; h= user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type :content-type:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:subject:from:from:date:date:received:received; s=aegis; t=1321735661; bh=34jQlPb05CSV3DQEx+7WA5PSre88tzrBwm1m8TJZthI=; b= UyY72gDF4NlyajpyfEnjqTu0mqgXdyzaV1VhKs8DUcCiy8I9GtRURTEqcLtNPpRN Ylip1uRdQf7q7szjxh9nHgVhDJqTbAS99SOYRcOFF0C20Wyiv2GgRFxde9SBUrOY l2uH8KfQc5uasToinALzz6+mz0PFd7l3xLXmbb54QNQ= X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV at spartan.hamla.org Received: from spartan.hamla.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (spartan.hamla.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with LMTP id wxYJJ8PSJHGk; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:47:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from magic.hamla.org (cpe-68-174-92-20.nyc.res.rr.com [68.174.92.20]) by spartan.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C56E3170F9; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:47:40 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:48:11 -0500 From: Sahil Tandon To: Pav Lucistnik Message-ID: <20111119204811.GA24792@magic.hamla.org> References: <3SkvVw2ZYzzk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> <1321728122.46494.0.camel@hood.oook.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1321728122.46494.0.camel@hood.oook.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Wietse Venema , Sahil Tandon , Renato Botelho , Jase Thew , Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Chris Rees Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 20:47:12 -0000 --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 19:42:02 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Wietse Venema p=C3=AD=C5=A1e v =C4=8Dt 17. 11. 2011 v 15:41 -0500: > > Pav Lucistnik: > > > Wietse Venema p??e v ?t 17. 11. 2011 v 13:23 -0500: > > > > Actually, a Postfix built-in default setting changed on 20110918. > > > >=20 > > > > It now enables IPv6 unless this is turned off in a configuration > > > > file. I can fix that at compile time, and thereby not trigger > > > > the error on build systems with unexpected IPv6 configurations. > > >=20 > > > This is interesting. > > >=20 > > > The build jails are configured to have only IPv4 address on lo0, > > > but the host have both IPv4 and IPv6 configured on its lo0. > > >=20 > > > Changing the jail configuration is possible but if a reasonable > > > workaround can be made in postfix-current port I'd prefer not to touch > > > pointyhat configuration (unexpected consequences and all that...) > >=20 > > I can competely fix this specific error instance with a one-line > > config file change, but I don't want to end up in the same boat > > again when some other program needs to be run during build time. > >=20 > > A more proactive workaround would be to treat "protocol not supported" > > as a non-fatal error, just like "address family not supported" is. > >=20 > > Please let me know if this works in the build cluster. It will log > > a warning but that should be justfied, because the system does have > > an abnormal configuration. >=20 > Yes, this works on the build cluster. >=20 > Sahil, can I commit it to the port? Wietse has made the change upstream and I plan to commit that in a little bit. Just running it through my tinderbox if folks don't mind the wait (a few hours). --=20 Sahil Tandon --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOyBYLAAoJENvQYAHAFtl3pd8IALqdONTiiDWjgY4wfNvT7Hsc jMPB+vm0BTSmIAXThSAwdbs0hX0gNZt+9fFLgC9mLC2lIrvrfAMQE2BUg4zm6FZZ OiQlnn9nXOyE7KeIAEU0pNXRAzO5kRlVLeLb+OmkPD264AYlw8dhYvJBugBJWzPA ZB9P1nmXmxLHFHdBAAfyftyN9phsRRViEWMiOuNtUK3/r0uKovBOw5Ouq2Ql/2uV HoM16MgqSHjQoZzTqWYBipB3EWfo7mroTAkhS2ZsNxQ3Fn6QtnyXmEF+G26qX98o MEAFbRjBz1TSh/HiiRkxfTM3P5PNDo165+CJ+ZBZ8EZsEc03k/w7S/oZLKsW9mM= =+tns -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi--