Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:48:11 -0500
From:      Sahil Tandon <sahil+freebsd-ports@tandon.net>
To:        Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Wietse Venema <wietse@porcupine.org>, Sahil Tandon <sahil+freebsd-ports@tandon.net>, Renato Botelho <garga@FreeBSD.org>, Jase Thew <freebsd@beardz.net>, Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform
Message-ID:  <20111119204811.GA24792@magic.hamla.org>
In-Reply-To: <1321728122.46494.0.camel@hood.oook.cz>
References:  <3SkvVw2ZYzzk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> <1321728122.46494.0.camel@hood.oook.cz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 19:42:02 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:

> Wietse Venema p=C3=AD=C5=A1e v =C4=8Dt 17. 11. 2011 v 15:41 -0500:
> > Pav Lucistnik:
> > > Wietse Venema p??e v ?t 17. 11. 2011 v 13:23 -0500:
> > > > Actually, a Postfix built-in default setting changed on 20110918.
> > > >=20
> > > > It now enables IPv6 unless this is turned off in a configuration
> > > > file.  I can fix that at compile time, and thereby not trigger
> > > > the error on build systems with unexpected IPv6 configurations.
> > >=20
> > > This is interesting.
> > >=20
> > > The build jails are configured to have only IPv4 address on lo0,
> > > but the host have both IPv4 and IPv6 configured on its lo0.
> > >=20
> > > Changing the jail configuration is possible but if a reasonable
> > > workaround can be made in postfix-current port I'd prefer not to touch
> > > pointyhat configuration (unexpected consequences and all that...)
> >=20
> > I can competely fix this specific error instance with a one-line
> > config file change, but I don't want to end up in the same boat
> > again when some other program needs to be run during build time.
> >=20
> > A more proactive workaround would be to treat "protocol not supported"
> > as a non-fatal error, just like "address family not supported" is.
> >=20
> > Please let me know if this works in the build cluster. It will log
> > a warning but that should be justfied, because the system does have
> > an abnormal configuration.
>=20
> Yes, this works on the build cluster.
>=20
> Sahil, can I commit it to the port?

Wietse has made the change upstream and I plan to commit that in a
little bit.  Just running it through my tinderbox if folks don't mind
the wait (a few hours).

--=20
Sahil Tandon

--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOyBYLAAoJENvQYAHAFtl3pd8IALqdONTiiDWjgY4wfNvT7Hsc
jMPB+vm0BTSmIAXThSAwdbs0hX0gNZt+9fFLgC9mLC2lIrvrfAMQE2BUg4zm6FZZ
OiQlnn9nXOyE7KeIAEU0pNXRAzO5kRlVLeLb+OmkPD264AYlw8dhYvJBugBJWzPA
ZB9P1nmXmxLHFHdBAAfyftyN9phsRRViEWMiOuNtUK3/r0uKovBOw5Ouq2Ql/2uV
HoM16MgqSHjQoZzTqWYBipB3EWfo7mroTAkhS2ZsNxQ3Fn6QtnyXmEF+G26qX98o
MEAFbRjBz1TSh/HiiRkxfTM3P5PNDo165+CJ+ZBZ8EZsEc03k/w7S/oZLKsW9mM=
=+tns
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111119204811.GA24792>