From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jun 2 3:49:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mailsrv.otenet.gr (mailsrv.otenet.gr [195.170.0.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 532B537B423 for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 03:49:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from keramidi@otenet.gr) Received: from hades.hell.gr (patr530-b118.otenet.gr [195.167.121.246]) by mailsrv.otenet.gr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f52An8U08272; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 13:49:08 +0300 (EEST) Received: (from charon@localhost) by hades.hell.gr (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f529iFE50517; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 12:44:15 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramidi@otenet.gr) Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 12:44:15 +0300 (EEST) From: Giorgos Keramidas X-X-Sender: To: Peter Pentchev Cc: Subject: Re: Fixing documented bug in env(1) In-Reply-To: <20010602114936.C24747@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Message-ID: <20010602124241.D50428-100000@hades.hell.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Peter Pentchev wrote: > FWIW, I, too, think that '--' would be a POLA-friendly choice. > However, if '==' were chosen, the patch to env.c would have to be > slightly modified, as attached. Yes, using '--' seems like a reasonable thing to do. Consistency with other uses of an 'argument that separates parts of the command line', etc. is one reason that I can easily come up with. -giorgos To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message