From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Mon May 16 07:30:36 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF165B3CADC; Mon, 16 May 2016 07:30:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92DC81E18; Mon, 16 May 2016 07:30:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from anthias (ip-109-45-0-254.web.vodafone.de [109.45.0.254]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1CE513F479; Mon, 16 May 2016 03:30:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 09:30:27 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r415188 - head/lang/gcc6-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <201605141350.u4EDoYK1007614@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 07:30:36 -0000 On Mon, 16 May 2016, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > I find it troublesome for infrastructure changes to happen without > taking basic tools like portlint into account. > > After the PORTSDIR removal, the introduction of TIMESTAMP is at > least the second case this year, and my current plan is not to > commit changes that would add warnings with the latest version. > of portlint. (Hence the above is the full diff for distinfo.) I noticed that portlint has been updated in between my commit and the (delayed) note above, which is good. The general point still stands, though. Gerald