From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar  2 00:05:56 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A63E16A423;
	Thu,  2 Mar 2006 00:05:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mux@freebsd.org)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CEE443D46;
	Thu,  2 Mar 2006 00:05:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mux@freebsd.org)
Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1920)
	id D56BF1A4DE1; Wed,  1 Mar 2006 16:05:55 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 01:05:55 +0100
From: Maxime Henrion <mux@FreeBSD.org>
To: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com>
Message-ID: <20060302000555.GI55746@elvis.mu.org>
References: <20060301170306.GZ55746@elvis.mu.org>
	<4405DF0A.7080101@t-hosting.hu> <440635CC.9030806@rogers.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <440635CC.9030806@rogers.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org, K?vesd?n G?bor <gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu>,
	current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Importing csup into base
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:05:56 -0000

Mike Jakubik wrote:
> K?vesd?n G?bor wrote:
> >Thanks a lot, csup is very great: fast and lightweight. :) CVSup was a 
> >huge pain to install. I hope you'll get enough donation to implement 
> >the cvs mode, too. :)
> 
> Not from my experience, last time i tried csup it was much slower than 
> cvsup, i hope this performance problem has been solved.

Well you should try a recent version of it.  In all the tests I have
been doing, csup has always been at least as fast as CVSup, and quite
often faster.

If the problem persists, you need to send me a precise and detailed
problem report.

Cheers,
Maxime