From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Aug 14 10:00:36 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA13880 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 14 Aug 1996 10:00:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from render.gu.kiev.ua (render.gu.kiev.ua [193.124.51.65]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA13839 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 1996 09:59:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from creator.gu.kiev.ua (root@creator.gu.kiev.ua [193.124.51.73]) by render.gu.kiev.ua with ESMTP id TAA06248; Wed, 14 Aug 1996 19:14:36 +0300 Received: (from stesin@localhost) by creator.gu.kiev.ua id TAA18844; Wed, 14 Aug 1996 19:12:53 +0300 From: Andrew Stesin Message-Id: <199608141612.TAA18844@creator.gu.kiev.ua> Subject: Re: ipfw vs ipfilter? To: sven@acca.nmsu.edu (Ian Logan) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 19:12:52 +0300 (EET DST) Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: stesin@gu.kiev.ua In-Reply-To: <199608141524.JAA13087@acca.nmsu.edu> from "Ian Logan" at Aug 14, 96 09:24:08 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi, | Well I've always been a bit of lurker in the past, but I've got to agree | than ipfw is really really klunky. If ipfilter is better, I definately | say go for it! | Ian I tried ipfw back in the past, found it unacceptable for my brains, went IPfilter way and had a success with only minor troubles and a _big_ win in functionality. I'm recommending IPfilter to FreeBSD people since long ago. Andrew Stesin -- nic-hdl: ST73-RIPE