From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Dec 13 16:49:20 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA01260
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 13 Dec 1997 16:49:20 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current)
Received: from word.smith.net.au (ppp5.portal.net.au [202.12.71.105])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA01196
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 13 Dec 1997 16:49:03 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from mike@word.smith.net.au)
Received: from word (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by word.smith.net.au (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA04478;
	Sun, 14 Dec 1997 11:12:14 +1030 (CST)
Message-Id: <199712140042.LAA04478@word.smith.net.au>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97
To: pb@fasterix.freenix.org (Pierre Beyssac)
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: small patch to fix MSG_COMPAT in recvfrom() 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 13 Dec 1997 18:18:09 BST."
             <19971213181809.AU40295@@> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1997 11:12:13 +1030
From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> I also have several other patches regarding the use of sockets by
> the Linux emulator, notably getsockopt(), raw sockets, and the
> IP_HDRINCL option which Linux handles differently from BSD in a
> subtle way. It allows me to run Linux ping, traceroute, and other
> small network "utilities" compiled on Linux such as teardrop.
> Should I send these patches to the list or to the Linux emulator
> maintainer?

If at all possible, please use send-pr to submit them, and then post 
the PR number you receive to the emulation list.  I am *extremely* 
interested in following this through; thanks a million for tracking the 
problems down!

mike