From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 08:20:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8277516A4E6; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:20:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ru@rambler-co.ru) Received: from relay0.rambler.ru (relay0.rambler.ru [81.19.66.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA6A43D7F; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:20:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@rambler-co.ru) Received: from relay0.rambler.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay0.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1BE6165; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:20:06 +0400 (MSD) Received: from edoofus.park.rambler.ru (unknown [81.19.65.108]) by relay0.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8943E6141; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:20:06 +0400 (MSD) Received: (from ru@localhost) by edoofus.park.rambler.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6) id k7O8KC59082432; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:20:12 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ru) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:20:12 +0400 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20060824082012.GA81296@rambler-co.ru> References: <5B7BD83A-6316-4C20-903E-B5D66D4F2642@khera.org> <44EB5354.6070007@paladin.bulgarpress.com> <44EB6411.4040406@paladin.bulgarpress.com> <20060823193309.GA77890@rambler-co.ru> <44ECBFE8.7000809@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44ECBFE8.7000809@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-Virus-Scanned: No virus found Cc: freebsd-stable Subject: Re: 5.5 to 6.1 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:20:19 -0000 --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 01:51:52PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 11:07:45PM +0300, Todorov @ Paladin wrote: > >> Also - why portupgrade is not always aware of > >> previously chosen options for a port build? > >> > > It depends. If options are OPTIONS (in the ports sense), they > > are saved and independent of portupgrade. If options are > > makefile options specified in pkgtools.conf, they are only > > taken into accont if the port is (re)build explicitly; they > > are not taken into account if a port is (re)built as a > > dependency of another port. In plain text: if port B has > > options in pkgtools.conf, and port A has B as its dependency, > > and you portinstall/portupgrade A, B will be built (if needs > > be) without pkgtools.conf options. Be careful. >=20 > sysutils/portconf does not have that limitation. If you specify flags usi= ng > that method, they will always be used. >=20 True. The implementation is also smart -- it doesn't spam make(1) environment when not necessary. Thanks! Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE7WE8qRfpzJluFF4RAgi3AJoDdNU4GCi8hjNPQTkgpZeIerwsJACgiKMr UxhzjAm1Jb5JzbNrOq7AWx0= =n8Zi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA--