Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 2 Apr 2001 11:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Marc W <mwlist@lanfear.com>
To:        j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re:X toolkits compared
Message-ID:  <200104021832.LAA58071@akira.lanfear.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

    they're all really complete and really good.  you need to sit down
and write a trivial little application with both and see which once you
feel more comfortable with.

    marc.




Marc W, San Francisco, CA
Kiltdown -- a free email client for X
www.kiltdown.org -- it's what's underneath that counts.

> -----------------------------
> From:  j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org>
> To:  freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
> Subject:  X toolkits compared
> Sent:  04/02/01 18:33> 
> 
> 
> 
> Licensing issues aside, which toolkit is easier to use:gtk or qt?  It
seems
> to me that KDevelop is a more complete tool, but i could be wrong.  I
would
> like to migrate from VC++ to BSD/X programming.  Then i will be LEET.
 ;)
> 
> jm
> -- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Jonathon McKitrick -- jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org           
> "It took the computing power of three C-64s to fly to the Moon.
> It takes a 486 to run Windows 95. Something is wrong here."
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200104021832.LAA58071>