Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 11:32:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Marc W <mwlist@lanfear.com> To: j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re:X toolkits compared Message-ID: <200104021832.LAA58071@akira.lanfear.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
they're all really complete and really good. you need to sit down
and write a trivial little application with both and see which once you
feel more comfortable with.
marc.
Marc W, San Francisco, CA
Kiltdown -- a free email client for X
www.kiltdown.org -- it's what's underneath that counts.
> -----------------------------
> From: j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org>
> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
> Subject: X toolkits compared
> Sent: 04/02/01 18:33>
>
>
>
> Licensing issues aside, which toolkit is easier to use:gtk or qt? It
seems
> to me that KDevelop is a more complete tool, but i could be wrong. I
would
> like to migrate from VC++ to BSD/X programming. Then i will be LEET.
;)
>
> jm
> --
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Jonathon McKitrick -- jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org
> "It took the computing power of three C-64s to fly to the Moon.
> It takes a 486 to run Windows 95. Something is wrong here."
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200104021832.LAA58071>
