Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 11:32:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Marc W <mwlist@lanfear.com> To: j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re:X toolkits compared Message-ID: <200104021832.LAA58071@akira.lanfear.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
they're all really complete and really good. you need to sit down and write a trivial little application with both and see which once you feel more comfortable with. marc. Marc W, San Francisco, CA Kiltdown -- a free email client for X www.kiltdown.org -- it's what's underneath that counts. > ----------------------------- > From: j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org> > To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: X toolkits compared > Sent: 04/02/01 18:33> > > > > Licensing issues aside, which toolkit is easier to use:gtk or qt? It seems > to me that KDevelop is a more complete tool, but i could be wrong. I would > like to migrate from VC++ to BSD/X programming. Then i will be LEET. ;) > > jm > -- > --------------------------------------------------------------- > Jonathon McKitrick -- jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org > "It took the computing power of three C-64s to fly to the Moon. > It takes a 486 to run Windows 95. Something is wrong here." > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200104021832.LAA58071>