From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 11 12:21:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 815671065674 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:21:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (ns0.blackend.org [82.227.222.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85B28FC22 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:21:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from gothic.blackend.org (gothic.blackend.org [192.168.1.203]) by abigail.blackend.org (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m7BCL076077607; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:21:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc@abigail.blackend.org) Received: from gothic.blackend.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gothic.blackend.org (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m7BCL0tg003176; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:21:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc@gothic.blackend.org) Received: (from marc@localhost) by gothic.blackend.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m7BCL0Wp003175; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:21:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:20:59 +0200 From: Marc Fonvieille To: Krishna Mohan Gundu Message-ID: <20080811122059.GD1022@gothic.blackend.org> References: <70ec82800808110235g293bd777i647e13873d640f35@mail.gmail.com> <20080811103525.GA1022@gothic.blackend.org> <70ec82800808110505r4b2840c7tfab4ff456e890653@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <70ec82800808110505r4b2840c7tfab4ff456e890653@mail.gmail.com> X-Useless-Header: blackend.org X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wep key index in examples of section 29.3 in handbook X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:21:03 -0000 On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 05:05:01AM -0700, Krishna Mohan Gundu wrote: > Hi Marc, > [...] > I did read this note. My wireless router configuration has no mention > of different keys. It simply takes a key for encryption. So I was > immediately thrown off this key business. Third key did not make any > sense to me. The fact that some access points have provision for only > one key is not clear from any documentation. Probably it helps here if > a note like this is added > > "Some access points take only one key, in which case use 1 for key index" > Ok, I see. What do you think about something like: "Note: If you do not have any idea of what is the key used by your access point, you should try to use 1 for both of the key and the index." -- Marc