Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:45:20 +0200 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely8.cicely.de> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: ticso@cicely.de, freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: booting UFS2 on alpha (was: cvs commit: src/sys/boot/common ufsread.c) Message-ID: <20021011104520.GY17920@cicely8.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <14845.1034332326@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <20021010210124.GV17920@cicely8.cicely.de> <14845.1034332326@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 12:32:06PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20021010210124.GV17920@cicely8.cicely.de>, Bernd Walter writes: > > >>>>boot dka400 > >(boot dka400.4.0.6.0 -flags 0) > >block 0 of dka400.4.0.6.0 is not a valid boot block > >bootstrap failure > > > >This one is my biggest problem. > >SRM doesn't accept the disklabel. > >Once I dd the first 512 bytes from an old disk SRM is happy. > >I compared them with hexdump, but wasn't able to find the reason. > > Is there some place which documents what the requirements for being > a valid boot-block is ? None that I know about. Maybe someone else on the alpha list knows? -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de ticso@cicely.de Usergroup info@cosmo-project.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021011104520.GY17920>