From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 18 18:23:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1233) id 25C25106566B; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:23:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:23:24 +0000 From: Alexander Best To: Andriy Gapon Message-ID: <20101118182324.GA36312@freebsd.org> References: <4CE50849.106@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4CE52177.3020306@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CE52177.3020306@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Stable , freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Current , "O. Hartmann" Subject: Re: TTY task group scheduling X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:23:24 -0000 On Thu Nov 18 10, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 18/11/2010 13:04 O. Hartmann said the following: > > On 11/18/10 02:30, grarpamp wrote: > >> Just documenting regarding interactive performance things. > >> This one's from Linux. > >> > >> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_2637_video&num=1 > > > > Well, > > it would be nice to have those improvements in FreeBSD, but I doubt this will make > > it in due time to FreeBSD's kernel. > > Well, I think that those improvements apply only to a very specific usage pattern > and are greatly over-hyped. you think so? judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact imo. cheers. alex btw: i posted a similar thread on freebsd-backers@, but nobody seemed interested in it. subject line is "sched_autogroup_enabled". > > P.S. What is the due time, BTW? > > -- > Andriy Gapon -- a13x