Date: Sun, 16 Jul 1995 18:15:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Peter Dufault <dufault@hda.com> To: imp@village.org (Warner Losh) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: And another g++ question Message-ID: <199507162215.SAA04276@hda.com> In-Reply-To: <199507162148.PAA04535@rover.village.org> from "Warner Losh" at Jul 16, 95 03:48:50 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warner Losh writes: > > minmax.h is the old way (or maybe just a g++ invention) to do what > limits.h does now. At least in the code that I've ported. Thanks Warner. I'll try limits.h and see if that works instead of minmax. I have one other issue - I get these when I try to link the application: > filebuf.cc:51: Undefined symbol `__vt$builtinbuf' referenced from text segment > stdstrbufs.o: Undefined symbol `__vt$builtinbuf' referenced from data segment > stdstrbufs.o: Undefined symbol `__vt$builtinbuf' referenced from data segment > stdstrbufs.o: Undefined symbol `__vt$builtinbuf' referenced from data segment > stdstrbufs.o: Undefined symbol `__vt$stdiobuf' referenced from data segment > stdstrbufs.o: Undefined symbol `__vt$stdiobuf' referenced from data segment > stdstrbufs.o: Undefined symbol `__vt$stdiobuf' referenced from data segment > strstream.cc:53: Undefined symbol `__vt$builtinbuf' referenced from text segment > strstream.cc:59: Undefined symbol `__vt$builtinbuf' referenced from text segment > strstream.cc:70: Undefined symbol `__vt$builtinbuf' referenced from text segment The curious thing is that there is a "__vt$10builtinbuf" defined in libg++.a but nothing without a 10. Also the undefined is coming from libg++ .o's, yet the undefineds don't show up in libg++.a namelist, so it must be some sort of g++ constructed sort of thing. Does anyone recognize this problem? Peter -- Peter Dufault Real Time Machine Control and Simulation HD Associates, Inc. Voice: 508 433 6936 dufault@hda.com Fax: 508 433 5267
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199507162215.SAA04276>