From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Mar 5 16:45:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from utility.clubscholarship.com (utility.clubscholarship.com [198.78.70.175]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 376F637B417; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 16:45:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (root@localhost) by utility.clubscholarship.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g260hWC71212; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 16:43:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@utility.clubscholarship.com) Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 16:43:32 -0800 (PST) From: Patrick Thomas To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: , Subject: Re: Four misc. questions related to jail usage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20020305164246.Y71209-100000@utility.clubscholarship.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Patrick Thomas writes: > > 1. Does each jail need to have its own proc filesystem mounted? > > No, procfs is pretty much useless these days (except for truss). In 4.5, won't `ps` (and perhaps other apps) not work for people in a jail if their jail does not have a proc file system mounted in their /proc ? --pt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message