From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 3 15:27:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFBEC106564A for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 15:27:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from mwi1.coffeenet.org (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF69B8FC14 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 15:27:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type; bh=s/dMuQkA7Z5m640TOoonVnFvz9s4bU4xRlde7prHh0I=; b=lOfDpsPRtjhChE+gzsVguAjaHIAiultBA55StLiCO/D44K3xcUhuGin7WggaPZv3xi0CD6j9197D/0b+pm8cG1/r00iaEb5CbVgvPLPk0EmMLkg1F+Fylf+mKJLwu7dE; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by mwi1.coffeenet.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Ri6Gq-000M7E-Fv for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 09:27:25 -0600 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpsa id 1325604438-88972-88971/5/2; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 15:27:18 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4EFF19A7.2060800@ose.nl> <4EFF94CA.3050304@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120101064247.3e8b0b56@scorpio> <4F00580D.1060208@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120101091420.117aa8f3@scorpio> <20120102065526.GA16481@hemlock.hydra> <20120102083114.6c09d839@scorpio> <20120102193319.GA31717@hemlock.hydra> <20120103020611.GA22209@chancha.local> <4F02A306.5060501@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120103161452.3b10bb2f.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 09:27:18 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Mark Felder Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20120103161452.3b10bb2f.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.60 (FreeBSD) X-SA-Score: -1.0 Subject: Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 15:27:26 -0000 On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 09:14:52 -0600, Polytropon wrote: > Maybe consider the chance that a FreeBSD OS can be > turned into closed source (which the license explicitely > allows) and put into some embedded device, a router, > a DSL modem, a managed switch... In parts like this, > you won't recognize FreeBSD anymore. If you consider > such devices "niche devices", think again: You'll > find them near any Internet-connected computer and > among the bowels of the whole Internet. Well we just picked up some Juniper MX80s here at work. That's right, they can route 80gbit/s and the OS that controls the hardware is basically FreeBSD at the core. (I understand the actual routing is fully done in hardware, but still -- I can get a familiar FreeBSD shell and do what I wish with these devices.) I think FreeBSD is doing *just* fine.