From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 16:41:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7478E106566C for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:41:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy.kosela@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f49.google.com (mail-bw0-f49.google.com [209.85.214.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF9BA8FC1A for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:41:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so3873780bwz.8 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 08:41:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=WRVOL9LfKsY4TjboXxHFVGCtVkDjfKYn9yyh12E0asc=; b=nft+6YTaKOpxHunUQx72Ty8/n2mS76LnA8kd9S6uPqcguvEXu+b5VSl0U3DRoKjKQf /Vrpo0LJUDpnJcVR7yihNlCSALhKCM8i0ixAH9s9yDfK8m6EgqFRsdAGvyBiG3DIDMua ddteBoUNg9ifggqF5YCP8oe2XmV/EYKy0lreQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=x3pHjgioc+5TVwqBkBtyLOCmnWXlx9FP6W9VjYDt1T2ldtLQcKFiw155Rok/OxXuDU 2dg5m3HGlbwhj1hFJD/6WHAJzcVAaEV66VQj2Jbf0VYh/8JEptxPl6ppTPjGzcHUmiJm SCQsNS3EYdhndkWo4SN5bMwwIhlTPNwtPI4tg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.46.18 with SMTP id h18mr7650830bkf.113.1292517695502; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 08:41:35 -0800 (PST) Sender: andy.kosela@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.121.147 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 08:41:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4d08a854.w8rPywliRhHs/MXH%akosela@andykosela.com> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:41:35 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ovfazt2ZLtRFPCh9TG8KpyUlsXk Message-ID: From: Andy Kosela To: Christian Weisgerber Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Allegations regarding OpenBSD IPSEC X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:41:38 -0000 On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Rob Farmer wrote: > >> They won't be secondary if someone does find a minor bug in the >> network stack (regardless who introduced it or if it is even related), >> which will probably happen given the attention this will invariably >> receive. > > Here's the first one: > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=129245633605693&w=2 Like des@ written in the other post even if the backdoor is still present in the OpenBSD code, IMHO it is very probable that FreeBSD is unaffected as the FreeBSD OCF implementation has been substantially modified. http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/bsdcon03/tech/leffler_crypto/leffler_crypto.pdf Either way we will all know for sure in the not distant future... --Andy