From owner-freebsd-current Sat Mar 11 18:28:00 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id SAA03252 for current-outgoing; Sat, 11 Mar 1995 18:28:00 -0800 Received: from specgw.spec.co.jp (specgw.spec.co.jp [202.32.13.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id SAA03230; Sat, 11 Mar 1995 18:26:28 -0800 Received: from localhost (root@localhost) by specgw.spec.co.jp (8.6.5/3.3Wb-SPEC) with UUCP id LAA12413; Sun, 12 Mar 1995 11:16:20 +0900 Received: by tama.spec.co.jp (8.6.10/6.4J.5) id WAA01529; Sat, 11 Mar 1995 22:37:22 +0900 From: Atsushi Murai Message-Id: <199503111337.WAA01529@tama.spec.co.jp> Subject: Re: Current PPP (3/8/95 SUP) To: rsoles@SIRIUS.COM (Roger L Soles) Date: Sat, 11 Mar 1995 22:37:21 +0900 (JST) Cc: current@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <9503110644.AA08786@SIRIUS.COM> from "Roger L Soles" at Mar 10, 95 10:50:59 pm Reply-To: amurai@spec.co.jp X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 1021 Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I've noted some interesting things with the PPP I built a few days ago: > > 1) If the line sits idle for a few moments, it get a reboot of the > machine -- but only if PPP is running. Otherwise the machine stays > up just fine. > > 2) If I use a 16550A(N) (Real national part), the PPP deamon will not > start, but on a 16450 (or a knock off 16550 that identifies as > a 16450) it works just fine... > > Anyone else seeing either of these? A PPP built with the 2.0 release > didn't exhibit this, and several other built with earlier SUPs did > (haven't built anything since the last SNAP, so I can't say exactly > when it might have started). > > Anyone got an (extra) clue... ;) I am running a current (day by day) with user process ppp and uucp. But I don't have any problem like you. Yes. I use 16550A for sio.... > - Roger Atsushi. -- Atsushi Murai Internet: amurai@spec.co.jp System Planning and Engineering Co,.Ltd. Voice : +81-33833-5341