From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 05:46:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FE03106564A for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 05:46:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E488FC14 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 05:46:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 10EB560CA; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 23:46:28 -0600 (CST) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 23:46:28 -0600 From: Mark Linimon To: Nomen Nescio Message-ID: <20120304054628.GB6622@lonesome.com> References: <20120302164505.GA1500@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports usable or not [was: flowtable usable or not] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 05:46:28 -0000 On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 09:08:28PM +0100, Nomen Nescio wrote: > Thanks mcl. I am off on other things for now but I will file PRs next time > I come across something. In the past I have emailed the port maintainer and > the answer is usually "yeah I know". After a few of those I thought filing > PRs is a waste of time considering the maintainer doesn't seem to care. Once PRs are filed, we are able to track them and if the maintainer does not work on them after a period of time, it's fair game for other people to work on them as well. mcl