From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 30 20:34:19 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A34FE5; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 20:34:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:60a2::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E211B19; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 20:34:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:923f:1:4576:f46b:6d13:91c5]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C12594AC1C; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 00:34:17 +0400 (MSK) Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 00:34:05 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <657034146.20130701003405@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: CFT: wpa_supplicant/hostapd import patch In-Reply-To: References: <7671255B-5582-428A-8ADC-3DF7AA32C772@FreeBSD.org> <8819701.20130630194938@serebryakov.spb.ru> <1415556931.20130701000811@serebryakov.spb.ru> <638557210.20130701001136@serebryakov.spb.ru> <1342388755.20130701001505@serebryakov.spb.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 20:34:19 -0000 Hello, Adrian. You wrote 1 =D0=B8=D1=8E=D0=BB=D1=8F 2013 =D0=B3., 0:25:23: AC> Basic p2p isn't that hard - we'd just create another vap (call it a AC> p2p mode vap) and have it implement the relevant semantics for p2p AC> (discovery, announcement, session master/slave handling, etc.) After AC> that I believe it looks like a normal station mode connection. Do I understand right, here you describe P in P2P? AC> I _think_ that the net80211 / driver side of things is pretty simple. AC> But I could be very wrong. AC> However, the p2p off-channel stuff requires significant stack and AC> driver work. I'm still sketching out what that's going to look like. And off-channel mode is mode, when here is (true) AP, which coordinates 2 clients to send traffic directly, without AP routing? --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov