From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Mar 21 15:41:43 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9B237B910
	for <FreeBSD-STABLE@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 15:41:41 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA18279;
	Tue, 21 Mar 2000 15:40:29 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
To: David Murphy <drjolt+freebsd-stable@redbrick.dcu.ie>
Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE <FreeBSD-STABLE@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: dot-0 releases 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 21 Mar 2000 23:28:25 GMT."
             <20000321232825.E46913@enigma.redbrick.dcu.ie> 
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 15:40:29 -0800
Message-ID: <18276.953682029@zippy.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Those are nice clear statements, which is exactly the sort of thing
> I'm advocating. However, while both notices are very likely to be

Actually, those our outdated statements and I'm going to ask the
Walnut Creek CDROM postmaster to remove them.  They only send a
confusing message.  Thanks for the reminder. :)

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message