Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:37:14 -0800 From: Linh Pham <question+advocacy@closedsrc.org> To: "Devon H.O'Dell" <dodell@sitetronics.com> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: SCO goes after BSD? Message-ID: <20031120173714.GS30420@q.internal.closedsrc.org> In-Reply-To: <7677F9D9-1B7E-11D8-856F-000502C708CB@sitetronics.com> References: <200311201822.48804.avleeuwen@piwebs.com> <7677F9D9-1B7E-11D8-856F-000502C708CB@sitetronics.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2003-11-20 18:24 +0100, "Devon H.O'Dell" <dodell@sitetronics.com> wrote: # Who cares? SCO is full of shit. #=20 # What does this have to do with the advocacy of FreeBSD? This list has=20 # been getting out of hand recently. I agree that SCO is full of it and all of the talk about SCO and SCO's press releases and quotes are getting out of hand... but remember that a lot of BOFHs will hear that SCO may/will be going after BSD and will shun it even more like the have with Linux. Oh what do I know anyway... --=20 Linh Pham question+advocacy@closedsrc.org Webmaster and FreeBSD Geek http://closedsrc.org Apprentice Manager Editor and Writer http://www.daemonnews.org Courage: The things I do for love | And So Western Civilization Crumbles --PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/vPvKwhofDeWkDMIRAobdAJ9Dytn15Xc9m5NZc/0h2l3DLxEg5QCeLy4d yRHQUwH4ELBmRC67SdtFQgE= =n7BX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031120173714.GS30420>