Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 18:52:55 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) Cc: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: libz.so.1.0 where are you? Message-ID: <27314.843875575@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 27 Sep 1996 20:49:14 CDT." <v02140b08ae7233f6f22e@[208.2.87.4]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> Is there some reason that the library was not brought into the -stable tre e? > > > >None that I see, just a matter of testing and time. > > IMHO, even untested, inclusion is better than NOT AVAILABLE. Even if it doesn't build and breaks the world? :-) Obviously, *some* degree of testing should be considered an acceptable minimum requirement. Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?27314.843875575>