Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 03:24:54 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> To: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: size of source tree Message-ID: <20140413032454.40cd8459@X220.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: <20140412170914.GA18485@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20140412115423.11092d84@X220.alogt.com> <20140412170914.GA18485@dan.emsphone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 12:09:14 -0500 Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> wrote: > In the last episode (Apr 12), Erich Dollansky said: > > I just compared the size of the source tree dated 26.03.14 with the > > source tree from today. > > > > The source tree dated 26.03.14 has a size of some 899GM while > > today's source tree has some 1.8GB. > > > > Why is it suddenly so huge? > > You have both trees; you tell us :) Compare the output of "du -d 1" yes, I have under different names. The smaller one does not have .svn in it. So, I either deleted it without recalling or something else happened. As I simply did a mv, .svn must have been moved to. Erich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140413032454.40cd8459>