From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar 20 18:58:07 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECDDD106566B
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:58:07 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org)
Received: from syn.atarininja.org (syn.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.158])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE9D8FC29
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:58:07 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org)
Received: by syn.atarininja.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 771C75C18; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:58:29 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:58:29 -0400
From: Wesley Shields <wxs@FreeBSD.org>
To: Steven Kreuzer <skreuzer@exit2shell.com>
Message-ID: <20080320185829.GA748@atarininja.org>
References: <20080320185145.GA40655@scruffy.exit2shell.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080320185145.GA40655@scruffy.exit2shell.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Installing a shell script
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:58:08 -0000

On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 02:51:45PM -0400, Steven Kreuzer wrote:
> Greetings-
> 
> I am in the process of updating a port to the latest version (dns/dnsperf)
> and I ran into an issue I was able to work around but I want to see if
> there is a nicer way to do it.
> 
> One of the differences between the version in ports and the current version
> is the addition of a shell script called resperf-report. If I simply use stock
> install method, I end up with the following error:
> 
> strip: /usr/local/bin/resperf-report: File format not recognized
> install: wait: No such file or directory
> *** Error code 70
> 
> So, to work around this what I ended up doing is basically installing the
> binaries and man pages by hand:
> 
> -PLIST_FILES=   bin/dnsperf bin/resperf
> +PLIST_FILES=   bin/dnsperf bin/resperf bin/resperf-report
>  MAN1=          dnsperf.1 resperf.1
> 
>   +do-install:
>   +       ${INSTALL} ${WRKSRC}/dnsperf ${PREFIX}/bin
>   +       ${INSTALL} ${WRKSRC}/resperf ${PREFIX}/bin
>   +       ${INSTALL_SCRIPT} ${WRKSRC}/resperf-report ${PREFIX}/bin
>   +.for MAN in ${MAN1}
>   +       ${INSTALL_MAN} ${WRKSRC}/${MAN} ${PREFIX}/man/man1
>   +.endfor
>   +
>    .include <bsd.port.mk>
> 
> Is there a better way to do this? Can I someone
> set a flag to tell the stock do-install to not strip the resperf-report
> when doing an install?

Does setting STRIP to an empty string work?  Acorrding to bsd.port.mk it
should.

-- WXS