From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Nov 18 20:02:47 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771E1110DD86 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2018 20:02:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from kagate.punkt.de (kagate.punkt.de [217.29.33.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AF446DA6A for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2018 20:02:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (hugo10.ka.punkt.de [217.29.44.10]) by gate1.intern.punkt.de with ESMTP id wAIK2XB6023540 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2018 21:02:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.29.46.123] ([217.29.46.123]) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id wAIK2X69092669 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2018 21:02:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) From: "Patrick M. Hausen" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\)) Subject: Re: isc-dhcpd refuses access? Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 21:02:32 +0100 References: To: freebsd-net In-Reply-To: Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 5AF446DA6A X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.84 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.22)[-0.222,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:217.29.32.0/20]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[punkt.de]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[3]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mailin.pluspunkthosting.de,mailin.pluspunkthosting.de]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.13)[-0.128,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[131.33.29.217.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.00)[country: DE(-0.01)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16188, ipnet:217.29.32.0/20, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Server: mx1.freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 20:02:47 -0000 Hi! > Am 16.11.2018 um 22:51 schrieb Freddie Cash : > While FreeBSD is generally better than most at supporting hybrid = interfaces > (tagged and untagged vlans on the same NIC), you really shouldn't do = that. > Configure it either as an access port (untagged vlan only) or a trunk = port > (tagged vlans only). While I generally agree with you here - if your peer is of Cisco brand, = there will always be an untagged VLAN on that trunk port. You can configure which one but you cannot get rid of it. Patrick --=20 punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung Kaiserallee 13a Tel.: 0721 9109-0 Fax: -100 76133 Karlsruhe info@punkt.de http://punkt.de AG Mannheim 108285 Gf: Juergen Egeling